The portrayal of women in Greek sculpture is greatly
indicative of their particular role and cultural positioning within the Grecian
society that they occupied. We see this in aspects of the statues of men and
women, such as the clothing, pose, physical characterizations as well as the
general scarcity of statues of women in classical Greece.
Clothing
is an important indicator of this. All classical Greek sculptures of women up
until the famous Knidian Aphrodite were clothed (Melissa Huang, Gender
Portrayals in Classical Greek Statuary, melissahuang.com) whereas male nudes
were almost the norm.
Here we have the Knidian Aphrodite alongside Polykleitos’s
Doryphoros. Doryphoros here is representative of the classically traditional
attempts at sculpture. The male form is clearly anatomically and proportionally
accurate; this is the Greek emphasis at mimesis (to accurately imitate the
object of its attention). We also see an idealization of the male form as with
all other Greek male statues. The brazen pose with exposed genitals (something
that is inconceivable even for the revolutionary Knidian Aphrodite) are all
cultural indicators of the acceptance and prevalence of nudity in male statues
at the time. Nudity in men conferred their power, their strong body and equally
strong mind (Ibid). Art itself was used as a hallmark for the values of Greek
culture. It formed the archetypes of how their ethos thought of virtue and this
is what they tried to infuse in their hyper idealized artwork (especially of
male nudes).
The
Knidian Aphrodite by Praxiteles was as stated earlier the first female nude
statue produced by Classical Greece. Prior to this a number of sculptures had
carved women in wet drapery to display the female body in an acceptable manner.
Praxiteles was obviously aware of this and tactful in his approach to female
nudity. In picking Aphrodite, the goddess of love and beauty he justified her
appearance in a nude form. It is important to note here that what is deemed
inappropriate for a Greek woman is yet appropriate for a Greek Goddess. Nudity
here is hence an obvious indicator of the power of the subject.
Yet
even the Goddess of love and beauty herself cannot be as brazen with her body
as the average male nude. The pose we see the Knidian Aprhodite in is the
famous pudica (again the first
example of its kind) which was made famous by Botticelli’s painting, The Birth
of Venus. The hand over the pubis indicates chastity and any sensuality found
in the sculpture would be unintentional (Ostrow, Ann Olga, and Claire L. Lyons
1997. 200). The male form as typified by Doryphoros has no such pretensions to
modesty with his genitals clearly on display. The pose however (the pudica) also has the probably
unintentional effect of drawing attention to the woman’s pubis. Aphrodite’s
pubis here is again interesting as it is devoid of both hair and any indication
of genitalia. This is curious as the Grecian culture spent a significant amount
of time detailing male genitalia on their statues. To not understate the case,
the Greeks even had an active cultural preoccupation with genitalia. They
depicted the genitalia of Egyptians and all other foreigners as large and
bulbous which was considered a sign of their barbarity, their own was always
depicted as small and tapered in their statues. The most prominent theories
today suggest that the exposed genitalia of a woman would be thought of as
sexually aggressive (a masculine trait discouraged in women) (Stewart Andrew F
1997. 99). The lack of pubic hair is easily accounted for by the prevalence of
depilation (hair removal) in Grecian society, especially among the upper
classes.
Sculpture
itself as a form of art provides insights into the functioning and outlook of
its indigenous society at large. The focus of this piece being women in Greek
sculpture has displayed the cultural positioning of women vis-à-vis men in
Grecian society. In doing so it has come across aspects of their respective
gender roles such as attitudes to nudity and sexuality as practiced during the
classical period.
References: 1. Ostrow, Ann Olga, and Claire L. Lyons.
“Making a World of Difference: Gender, asymmetry, and the Greek nude.” In Naked
truths: women, sexuality, and gender in classical art and archaeology. New
York: Routledge, 1997.
2. Stewart, Andrew F.. “Of War and Love.” In Art, desire, and the body
in ancient Greece. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

No comments:
Post a Comment